Prepare for the New York Law Exam with interactive study tools and comprehensive multiple-choice quizzes. Enhance your understanding with detailed explanations and tips to excel in your NYLE. Get ready to ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which statement about sexual offenses in New York is false?

  1. Forcible compulsion includes threats that cause fear of physical injury

  2. Marital rape is recognized in the state of New York

  3. Conviction may only rely on corroborating evidence from witnesses

  4. Intoxication is not a valid defense in sexual offense cases

The correct answer is: Conviction may only rely on corroborating evidence from witnesses

The statement regarding the necessity for a conviction to rely exclusively on corroborating evidence from witnesses is false. In New York, a conviction for sexual offenses can be based on the testimony of the victim alone, without the requirement for additional corroborative evidence. This principle is particularly significant in sexual assault cases, where the victim's account is often the primary, if not sole, source of evidence presented in court. While corroborating evidence can strengthen a case and is beneficial in establishing credibility, it is not an absolute requirement for a conviction. This emphasizes the importance of the victim's testimony in the judicial process and reflects the understanding that sexual offenses can occur in circumstances where witnesses are not present. The other statements are accurate representations of New York law. Forcible compulsion does indeed include threats that instill fear of physical harm, confirming the seriousness of applying force or coercion in sexual crime cases. Marital rape is recognized in New York, establishing that consent within marriage can be invalidated if coercion or force is used. Lastly, the assertion that intoxication is not a valid defense aligns with the legal stance that individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of their state of intoxication at the time the offense occurs.