New York Law (NYLE) Practice Exam

Is Paul's action time barred given the statute of limitations for Claim A varies by state?

1. Yes, because the claim is not timely under both Pennsylvania and New York law

2. Yes, unless the court extends the time for good cause

3. No, because the claim is timely under New York law

4. No, unless allowing the claim will prejudice the defendant

The correct answer is: No, because the claim is timely under New York law

The claim is deemed timely under New York law, which indicates that, despite variations in the statute of limitations across different states, the law in New York permits the filing of this particular claim within the applicable time frame. In a multi-state context, it's essential to assess the specific statutes that apply based on where the action is filed. Paul's situation reflects an understanding that legal claims must be initiated within set deadlines, and New York may offer a longer or more favorable statute of limitations for the type of claim being considered compared to Pennsylvania or any other state. Since the claim adheres to New York's requirements and is within its permissible time limits, it can proceed even if other states might impose restrictions that would render it time-barred. The other options suggest potential barriers or restrictions that do not apply when the claim is filed in a jurisdiction where it is timely. They reference conditions that would only come into play in situations where the claim is already considered late. Therefore, focusing on New York law's acceptance of the claim reinforces the understanding of the timing and procedural aspects vital to such legal evaluations.